You have, or know about, an open site, beginning with
http:// exactly, which has English language, quality
content, and is created by good, rugged, standard,
classic-style HTML means -- and you also have checked
that this site is not already included in the Yoga6d.org
search engine? Then type in the exact name -- we normally
include only the frontpage (up to the first slash as example
www.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz.com/) of each website --
but type in the frontpage that comes up also, even if it
has a little bit after the first slash, e.g. /index.php
or /home or such --
there are some exceptions we make for very high quality
subsites when these are part of a larger site which respects
privacy in a tasteful manner.

Since the Yoga6d.org search engine -- with its mirror sites,
showing exactly the same content -- is oriented towards
the creative thinker, the creative worker, wanting to
be stimulated in various ways and not merely knowing
aforehand what is so-called "useful" -- then it makes
full sense that the advertisements included are for all,
and not 'targeted' at all. Quite apart from the bad taste
of 'targeted' ads on computer networks, this means that
the advertisement must stand on its own and represent
a quality product of general interest, and this will bring
increased attention to this product. 

But this also means that -- in contrast to ideas we had
before the big change in May 2013, which we still indicate
as a transition date on top of all the search results,
all the time -- sometimes some quality selection mechanisms
are employed so as to give a presence more to quality than
to nonquality sites. For the judgements as to quality,
there is a number of philosophical texts on the yoga4d.org
and yoga6d.org sites, as well as on the main G15 Yoga6dorg
programming page norskesites.org/fic3, that lay forth some
standards for this.

Feel free to use META DESCRIPTION and META KEYWORDS to get
stuff in. Some near-english sites are included sometimes.


FOR THE NON-TECHNICAL PERSON:

* What is HTML? It is the simplest most safe most standard
way of creating webpages, not owned by any company. This is
so especially for the first versions of HTML.

* What keywords? At least three in size and with only the
english alphabet, no digit as first character. But these
must be on the front page of your site for this to be included,
you don't type them in here.

* Why are some sites included in a search that appear not
to have this keyword on the front page? Try to View Source
in your browser and you'll perhaps find that it is listed
there after all, but in a hidden form. There is no attempt
to implant artificial intelligence here: this is an honest,
standard, easy, natural way to free-search for individual
words in a very wide range of sites indeed.

* What if my name or my company name is too common to be 
included? Then I'm sure you can cook up a related name that
you also can have on the frontpage of the www webpage
somewhere, near its top.

* I have tried to list the site for several months, it is
still not there: what can be done? Go through the content
of the site: the front page must have English text on it,
and not masses of meaningless javascript or other programming
code on top, and it mustn't be merely based on a plug-in
type of programming language. It helps that there's something 
about it that fits with the notion of quality as presented
elsewhere. It helps that it isn't tied up to rediculous
groupings such as Twitter or Facebook where people constantly
try to up their score of quantity of followers or friends --
we emphasize the value of such as Tumblr, where what matters
is the quality of each action that matters, and quantities --
whatever meaning they may sometimes have -- are associated
with the good action, not the person or company, not the
page itself. For in any attempt to create insiders, such as
Facebook constantly tries, there is a byproduct of outsiders,
and the latter may represent also those who have genuine
quality to contribute with. This is therefore an alternative
approach to such as Twitter and Facebook. We regard those
who actively support such as Twitter and Facebook as people
who have yet work to do on their own insight into what kind
of future society we want to contribute to. The role of
computers is clear, but we must caution any tendency to make
of computer networks a kind of sports-like arena of 
competition. They are supposed to facilitate beauty, not
provide false pillows of high-score trash-quality to sleep on.